Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeremy DašŸ¦Ž's avatar

Thanks for sharing this powerful piece, and one that hits close to home for me too. Sorry you're having to deal with loss in this brutal way.

You're right that AI music is here to stay, and I share your lack of illusion about that. But I feel your argument is even stronger than you're giving it credit for. The issue isn't just that AI music is disposable, it's that there's no one on the other end of it. Your mother-in-law didn't just remember a song. She remembered being in the same room as a human being who mattered to the culture. Her Sinatra story isn't really about his music, it's about stumbling into his life and becoming part of his story. That triangle between listener, music, and artist who actually lived is what forges those core memories. GenAI music removes that signal and replaces it with a different one: "no human artist was needed for this."

So I'd push your question a step further: it's not just whether AI music will steal ambient space (it will). It's whether we're watching the end of music as a vessel for shared human storytelling. Is a first kiss as memorable when it's soundtracked by GenAI rather than music from an artist with real fans and a story? Because that's what actually powers memory at the deepest level. Not familiarity, but shared story. If others also care about that music and that artist, there's real value in the connective tissue it creates.

I'd argue that's the most underrated thing real artists carry: a finite life that listeners can accidentally walk into. No algorithm generates that. It's the moat GenAI music will never be able to replicate: the human experience.

Steve Goldberg's avatar

I feel like I could have written this piece; it mirrors my current experience. Also, I just watched the documentary Alive Inside a week ago and was so moved by it, that I sent an email to the filmmakers to see if I can get involved in their program to bring ipods (or whatever mp3 players they are using today) into the memory care/assisted living facilities. I haven't heard back from them yet.

It should be a top priority for these places to provide the music that residents with dementia/Alzheimer's grew up with to them, in whatever way is possible. I imagine the AI music was "free," which is why they chose to play that instead of actual music from the 50s and 60s. My aunt lives in memory care, and whenever I go visit, I play her music on my phone, and she sings along, like the people in the documentary. She's not able to work any equipment, so I doubt an iPod, even one with a single button, will be utilized by her. I know they have someone come a couple of times a week to play old songs on the piano, which is great, but it is frustrating to see how underutilized the power of music is in these facilities.

The AI issue is a can of worms way too large for me to comprehend. My guess is that once the AI companies (and their investors) want their money, people will refuse to pay the fees, causing chaos. It will eventually all get trickled down to 2-3 AI megacompanies (like Google, Apple) and tied into our other accounts with them, where we have no choice but to pay for AI, if we want access to our email, etc.

But since we will lose our jobs to AI, the cash flow will dry up, so it's a strategy destined to fail. That's my semi-luddite prediction anyway.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?